Casey not the father of Jamie-Lynn’s bastard child?

~Roll mouse over photo to derobe~


The story keeps getting better. Star magazine is reporting that Casey is not the actual father of Jamie-Lynn’s baby. The magazine sites two separate family insiders who claim that, prior to conception, Casey and Jamie were barely on speaking terms. The sources are also claiming that the actual father is a much older man!

Friends have said that Jamie Lynn was no longer even seeing Casey – and family members told Star that they believe the real father is a much older executive at her children’s TV show ‘Zoey 101′.

“Casey is being paid off to be the family’s fall guy while the real father remains unidentified,” Star magazine insists.

They say the real reason is that an older man could be charged with statutory rape if revealed to be the father of an under-aged girl’s baby.

But in Jamie Lynn’s home state of Louisiana, Casey would escape charges because a 16-year-old can legally have sex with someone less than two years older than her. “Conveniently, Casey falls under the bar by just 26 days.

“The man many suspect is the father, however, would face charges and probably prison time if he were to come forward and admit he had sex with her,” Star magazine states.

Comments (2) “Casey not the father of Jamie-Lynn’s bastard child?”

Dee RoberDecember 26, 2007 @ 11:53 am

wow. star is not the best source. but we all knew this story was far from over

Dee Rober
jannabethDecember 26, 2007 @ 6:53 pm

omg what a lil hussy


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.